Oof.
This movie is just not good. It is the kind of comedy sequel that makes one question whether or not the original is actually as funny as remembered. The same writers and director, the same actors, even the same tone and style of humor. So why was it so funny twenty years ago and now it is so damned unfunny? What could have possibly been their undoing?
“Dumb and Dumber To” picks up twenty years after the original, with Lloyd (Jim Carrey) and Harry (Jeff Daniels) looking the same save for the wrinkles. It is possible that these characters are somehow dumber now as they have aged, but that’s it. They are the same. And they go on another ridiculous road trip based on another misunderstanding and they encounter another set of killers and Lloyd’s lust for love is again the driving force for the shenanigans. So much is the same. So why does it stink?
This movie is a bunch of dumb humor without a hint of cleverness to any of it. At least “Dumb and Dumber” felt like a “smart” dumb movie, whereas this one just goes for the low hanging fruit. For a movie being so many years in the making, it sure feels quite half baked and not so well thought out. The initial set up is a decent one, too: Harry and Lloyd set out to find Harry’s kid that he just found out he has, but now this kid is all grown up. Obviously the fruit of their respective loins is bound to be a dumb dumb (sorry to break it to you, Forrest Gump), and the character they came up with is okay, but she’s not all that memorable or interesting in the long run. It’s not like I want to see her in a “Dumb and Dumber 3” or anything. Nothing against Rachel Melvin who played this character, she was great, it was just what they asked her to do, which wasn’t much.Continue Reading …




(Right Click Download Link To Save)
(Right Click Download Link To Save)

(Right Click Download Link To Save)